Definition: Now Jehoshaphat slept with his fathers, and was buried with his fathers in the city of David. And Jehoram his son reigned in his stead.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from 2 Chronicles 21:1 together. It’s a pretty important passage about a king and his family! Here's what it means in simpler terms: Basically, this verse tells us that Jeoshaphat (a king before him) was buried with his father in the city of David. Let’s unpack that a little further: Jeoshaphat: He was a king who lived a long time ago. Buried with his fathers: This means he died and was laid to rest alongside his parents, likely in a place of significance like a cemetery or a temple. In the city of David: David was a very important leader in the early days of Israel. He’s considered a key figure in the story of establishing Jerusalem as the capital city. So, Jeoshaphat’s burial happened in that city. So, what's the big deal? This verse establishes a strong connection between Jeoshaphat and David. It shows that he was deeply connected to the founding of Jerusalem, and his family was part of the history of that place. It suggests a continuity of leadership and tradition in that region. Important Note: The verse doesn’t tell us why he was buried with his father, but it highlights his importance as a figure linked to David's early reign. --- Do you want me to explain any part of this verse in more detail? For example, would you like me to: Discuss the significance of the city of David? Explain what " Jehoshaphat" might have meant in his time?

Definition: So the Edomites revolted from under the hand of Judah unto this day. The same time [also] did Libnah revolt from under his hand; because he had forsaken the LORD God of his fathers.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from 2 Chronicles 21:10 together. It’s a really important passage about conflict and rebellion in ancient Israel. Here's an explanation in simpler terms: The Basic Story: This verse describes a series of rebellions – two groups fighting against each other – that happened between the Edomites and the Libnah. Let’s unpack it step-by-step: “So the Edomites revolted from under the hand of Judah unto this day.” This tells us that the Edomites, a group living in the region east of Israel, started to disobey God's commands and push against the land they were supposed to be in. "Under the hand of Judah" means they were rebelling against the Kingdom of Israel, which was under the rule of King David. It’s like they were defying his authority. “The same time [also] did Libnah revolt from under his hand; because he had forsaken the LORD God of his fathers.” This is where it gets more complex. The Libnah was a group living in the region to the south of Israel, and they were rebelling against the rule of King David. But this rebellion wasn’t just random; it stemmed from a key thing: they had broken their covenant with God. “Forsaken the LORD God of his fathers” means they stopped following God's laws and promises. They weren't just disobeying, they were actively rejecting God's guidance. Putting It All Together – The Big Picture: Essentially, this verse describes a long-running pattern of rebellion by Edomites and Libnah against the people of Israel. It shows that these groups weren’t acting on their own volition; they were driven by a rejection of God's will. Important Context (Briefly): The Kingdom of Israel: This was the kingdom established by David, ruled by kings like Solomon. Covenant with God: The Old Testament is full of covenants – agreements between God and people. These covenants were important because they defined how God wanted to relate to them. Breaking a covenant is a serious offense. Why it’s significant: 2 Chronicles 21:10 is often seen as a warning about the potential for rebellion and disobedience, and it highlights the importance of faithfulness to God's laws. --- Do you want me to: Explain any part in more detail? Connect this verse to other parts of the Bible? Discuss what this story might symbolize (e.g., the struggle between good and evil)?

Definition: Moreover he made high places in the mountains of Judah, and caused the inhabitants of Jerusalem to commit fornication, and compelled Judah [thereto].

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from 2 Chronicles 21:11. It’s a really important and troubling passage about the rebuilding of the Temple in Jerusalem during the time of King Hezekiah. Here's what it means in simpler terms: The Basic Idea: This verse describes a period of serious societal breakdown and moral decay that led to a focus on building too much – specifically, high places and encouraging immoral behavior within Jerusalem. Let’s unpack it piece by piece: “Moreover he made high places in the mountains of Judah…” This means Hezekiah, King of Judah, built significant structures – temples, shrines, and other elevated areas – on the mountains of Judah. This was a deliberate act of building up something that wasn't meant to be a sacred space for God. It suggests a disregard for what was truly important – the presence of God. “…and caused the inhabitants of Jerusalem to commit fornication…” This is the core of the problem. "Fornication" means sexual intercourse outside of marriage. The verse says that the people in Jerusalem were encouraged and permitted to engage in this kind of behavior. It highlights a shift away from righteous living and towards immoral actions. “…and compelled Judah [thereto].” This is a crucial part. “Compelled” means driven or urged. Hezekiah’s actions, fueled by the building of these high places, led to a culture where people were pressured to engage in this kind of behavior – essentially, being forced into it. What's the Significance? This verse is seen as a warning about the dangers of: Idolatry: Building things that weren’t meant for worship was considered idolatry - worshipping other gods instead of God. Moral Decay: It indicates a decline in spiritual values and a focus on worldly pleasures over righteousness. Political Instability: The actions led to a situation where Jerusalem became increasingly morally corrupt, potentially leading to social unrest and conflict. In short, it's a story about a king who prioritized building something too big – and that ultimately created a problem for his people. --- Disclaimer: I am an AI Chatbot and not a biblical scholar. This explanation is based on common interpretations of the text within religious contexts. If you’re exploring this passage in more detail, it's always best to consult with a knowledgeable Bible teacher or scholar. Would you like me to: Explain another part of this verse? Discuss the historical context surrounding this event?

Definition: And there came a writing to him from Elijah the prophet, saying, Thus saith the LORD God of David thy father, Because thou hast not walked in the ways of Jehoshaphat thy father, nor in the ways of Asa king of Judah,

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from 2 Chronicles 21:12. It’s a really important and somewhat mysterious passage about the end times and God's plan. Here’s what it means in simpler terms: The Basic Idea: This verse is saying that Elijah, a prophet of God, was sending a message to King David’s descendants (specifically, to Judah) warning them about a time when they were drifting away from the righteous path. It's essentially an urgent plea for them to remember and follow God’s instructions. Let’s unpack it piece by piece: “And there came a writing to him…” : This refers to a message delivered by Elijah – a very significant prophet who lived during King David’s time. “…from Elijah the prophet…” : This identifies Elijah as the one sending this message. “…saying, Thus saith the LORD God of David thy father…” : This is the core of the verse. Elijah is telling David's descendants that God himself is speaking to them. “Because thou hast not walked in the ways of Jehoshaphat thy father…” : This is where it gets a little more complicated, and it’s a key part of the message. Jehoshaphat was a king who led Israel through a period of great division and conflict. “Jehooshaphat” means "peaceful" or “fortunate.” “Thy father” refers to David. So, this part means: “Because you haven’t followed the path of Jehoshaphat - a time when they were righteous and followed God's instructions - you are drifting from the way God wants you to go.” “…nor in the ways of Asa king of Judah” : This continues the message. It points out that Asa was a king who led Israel through a period of instability and division, and he wasn’t following God's instructions well either. What’s the Big Picture? The verse is suggesting that there's a risk of Judah (and perhaps other nations) straying from God’s path. It’s telling them to revert to the righteousness they previously possessed, or at least to strive towards it, before it becomes too late. It's a warning about potential disaster. Why is this important? This verse is often interpreted as a foreshadowing of the downfall of Judah under King Asa and later, the destruction of Israel. It’s a reminder that obedience and faithfulness to God are crucial for lasting success and prosperity. In short, it's a message about maintaining righteousness and avoiding falling into a path of disobedience. --- Disclaimer: I am an AI Chatbot and not a religious expert. This explanation is based on common interpretations of biblical texts. Do you want me to: Explain any part of the verse in more detail? Talk about what this verse might symbolize? Give you some context about the times when this verse was written?

Definition: But hast walked in the way of the kings of Israel, and hast made Judah and the inhabitants of Jerusalem to go a whoring, like to the whoredoms of the house of Ahab, and also hast slain thy brethren of thy father’s house, [which were] better than thyself:

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this difficult passage from 2 Chronicles 21:13. It's a really serious and impactful verse that describes a devastating period in Israel’s history. Here’s an explanation in simpler terms: The Core of the Verse: This verse is condemning King Hezekiah for allowing Judah and Jerusalem to turn away from God and worship false gods – essentially, they were practicing idolatry (worshiping other things instead of God). It’s a stark warning about the consequences of disobedience. Let's unpack it piece by piece: "But hast walked in the way of the kings of Israel..." - This tells us that Hezekiah was leading and influencing the people of Judah and Jerusalem, following the example and actions of the previous kings. It’s a focus on a particular period of leadership. "...and hast made Judah and the inhabitants of Jerusalem to go a whoring..." – This is the key part. "Whorsing" refers to a very specific, ancient form of idolatry—a practice where people worship idols or false gods. Hezekiah’s people were actively worshipping these false deities. They were sacrificing to them, making offerings, and generally engaging in practices that weren't centered on God. "...like to the whoredoms of the house of Ahab..." – This is a direct comparison. The "whoredoms" are a very specific and disturbing type of pagan worship practiced by King Jezebel in ancient Israel. They involved making offerings to idols, often involving ritual blood sacrifices. Hezekiah's people were mimicking this behavior. "[which were] better than thyself:" – This is the most shocking part. Hezekiah’s family was better than him! His father was a powerful and wise king, and his descendants had a higher status and a deeper connection to God. Hezekiah's actions were seen as a betrayal of this established order and a rejection of divine authority. What it means – The Big Picture: This verse paints a picture of profound moral failure. It’s a warning about: Disobedience: Hezekiah was disobeying God’s commands to worship Him and follow His laws. Idolatry: He was actively practicing the worship of false gods, which is considered a grave sin in the Bible. Loss of Order: The verse highlights a breakdown in the established order and authority of Israel. It suggests a shift away from righteousness and towards chaos. Important Context: This passage comes before the destruction of Jerusalem, which was a direct result of this idolatry. It’s a moment of crisis for Israel and a crucial part of their history. In essence, this verse is a powerful condemnation of disobedience and a reminder that true worship requires obedience to God's laws. --- Do you want me to: Explain any of these concepts in more detail? Connect it to a specific biblical story or figure? Discuss the historical context of this verse?

Definition: Behold, with a great plague will the LORD smite thy people, and thy children, and thy wives, and all thy goods:

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this passage from 2 Chronicles 21:14. It’s a really serious and frightening verse in the Bible, and it speaks of a devastating judgment against Israel. Here's an explanation in simpler terms: What it Means: This verse describes a catastrophic event – a terrible plague – that God will unleash upon the people of Israel. Let's unpack each part: “Behold…” : This is a way of saying "Watch this." It’s a command, a warning, or an observation of what’s about to happen. “…with a great plague…” : This isn’t just a little cough or sickness. It's a massive, widespread disaster – a “plague” is a severe disease or affliction. Think of it as a complete and overwhelming loss of life and well-being. “…will the LORD smite thy people…” : This means God is directly punishing Israel. He’s actively inflicting suffering upon them. "Smite" implies a forceful, deliberate action – like an attack or punishment. "...and thy children, and thy wives, and all thy goods:” This is the most devastating part. It tells us that this plague won't just affect people directly – it will also destroy everything they own: their families, their possessions, even their lives! What’s the Context? This verse comes right after a description of the Israelite rebellion and God's judgment on them. It’s a very clear warning about the consequences of disobedience and sin. The Bible is showing that God is not just punishing them; He is actively inflicting suffering to demonstrate His holiness, justice, and power. Important Note: It’s crucial to understand this verse within its historical context. The Old Testament describes a period of intense judgment and exile for Israel. This verse is a direct consequence of their actions – their refusal to follow God's laws. In short, it’s a terrifying prophecy about a devastating plague that will destroy everything the people of Israel hold dear. --- Do you want me to: Explain another part of this passage? Discuss the historical background of this verse? Talk about what this verse might be trying to convey about God's perspective on sin and judgment?

Definition: And thou [shalt have] great sickness by disease of thy bowels, until thy bowels fall out by reason of the sickness day by day.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from 2 Chronicles 21:15. It’s a really serious and uncomfortable passage about illness. Here's what it means in simpler terms: The Basic Idea: This verse is saying that someone experiencing significant pain and suffering due to sickness will eventually experience the loss of their digestive system – specifically, their bowels. Let’s unpack it piece by piece: “And thou [shalt have] great sickness…” : This means you are going to experience a lot of trouble and discomfort. It’s not just a little ache; this is a deep and persistent problem. “…by disease of thy bowels…” : This refers to the digestive system – your stomach, intestines, and everything that helps you absorb nutrients from food. “Disease” here means illness or problems within that system. “…until thy bowels fall out by reason of the sickness day by day.” : This is the most impactful part. It means that this suffering won’t just be temporary. It will continue until your digestive system completely fails, and you lose all the ability to absorb nutrients from food. “Sickness day” is a metaphor for a prolonged period of illness – it's not just one bad day; it’s a constant struggle. What does this mean practically? Historically, this verse was interpreted as a warning about impending doom or a very difficult time in someone's life. It could signify: A long and painful illness: It suggests a serious and ongoing health problem. A period of despair: The focus on the loss of one’s digestive system can point to a feeling of hopelessness and struggle. A spiritual consequence: Some interpretations suggest it relates to a weakening of one's spirit – a lack of strength or vitality that leads to suffering. Important Note: This verse is often interpreted within a context of judgment and severity. It’s not meant to be taken lightly, but rather as a reminder of the potential for significant suffering when facing difficult circumstances. --- Disclaimer: I am an AI Chatbot and not a religious scholar. This explanation is based on common interpretations of biblical texts and should not be considered a definitive or exhaustive theological analysis. Would you like me to: Explain another verse? Discuss the historical context of this passage?

Definition: Moreover the LORD stirred up against Jehoram the spirit of the Philistines, and of the Arabians, that [were] near the Ethiopians:

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from 2 Chronicles 21:16. It’s a really important and somewhat unsettling passage about a dramatic shift in events. Here's what it means in simple terms: The Basic Idea: This verse describes a powerful and frightening event where God is actively intervening to stop something terrible from happening. Basically, God is sending a divine punishment against two groups of people – the Philistines (a group of seafaring people) and the Arabs – because they were near to Ethiopia. Let’s unpack it piece by piece: “Moreover the LORD stirred up…” : This means that God wasn't just thinking about something bad happening; He was actively causing it to occur. It sounds like a divine intervention, a forceful action by God. “…against Jehoram…” : This refers to King Jehoram of Judah (a region in Israel). He was a ruler who had been exiled and was facing a serious challenge. “…the spirit of the Philistines…” : This means that the Philistines, who were often traders and sailors, were being targeted by God’s wrath. They were seen as a threat. “…and of the Arabians…” : The Arabs were also in danger – they were near to Ethiopia. Ethiopia was a region known for its vast herds of animals and strategic location. What's happening? The verse suggests that God is sending a punishment against these groups because they were near to a dangerous and potentially devastating place - Ethiopia. This could be interpreted as a warning about the dangers of venturing into unfamiliar or politically unstable areas. Important Context: This passage appears in the Book of 2 Chronicles, which was written after the fall of King Jehoram’s kingdom. It's often seen as a significant event that led to further political instability and ultimately, the collapse of Judah. It highlights God's power and judgment, and his concern for the safety and well-being of his people. In short: God is sending a punishment against the Philistines and Arabs because they were near to Ethiopia – a dangerous area that he wants to protect against. --- Do you want me to: Explain another part of this verse? Discuss what this verse might symbolize (like fear, divine judgment, or protection)?

Definition: And they came up into Judah, and brake into it, and carried away all the substance that was found in the king’s house, and his sons also, and his wives; so that there was never a son left him, save Jehoahaz, the youngest of his sons.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this passage from 2 Chronicles 21:17. It’s a really impactful story about a king’s betrayal and the consequences. Here's a simplified explanation: The Basic Story: King Jehoahaz was King of Judah. He was known for being very generous, but also incredibly greedy. He stole from the king’s house. The Bible says he took all the valuable things – people, possessions, and even wives – that were stored in the royal palace. He carried it away. He didn't just hide it; he took it all out of the kingdom. He left no male heir. This is the crucial part. After this theft, there was no son born to Jehoahaz. All that remained was Jehoahaz himself – a single man named Jehoahaz. What it Means - A Bit More Depth: This verse paints a picture of a deeply corrupt and ruthless king. It’s a story about: Greed & Betrayal: The king prioritized his own wealth and power over the well-being of his people. He stole from them, showing a lack of respect for their lives and possessions. Loss of Legacy: The most significant consequence is that he lost any potential future descendants – meaning no sons to inherit the throne or continue the family line. It highlights the devastating impact of one person’s actions on an entire kingdom. Important Note: The verse doesn't just say "he had no son." It describes a complete and utter absence of male heirs, making it a very clear case of a lost dynasty. In short, this is a story about a king who stole from his people and caused the loss of their future. --- Do you want me to: Explain another Bible verse? Discuss the significance of this story in more detail (e.g., its connection to other biblical events)? Answer any specific questions you have about this passage?

Definition: And after all this the LORD smote him in his bowels with an incurable disease.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from 2 Chronicles 21:18. It's a really powerful and sobering passage about death. Here’s what it means in simpler terms: The Basic Story: This verse comes after the story of King David losing his life. David was a hugely important king, but he suffered a terrible illness that ultimately ended his life. What Happened? David’s Illness: The verse says the LORD (God) “smote him in his bowels” – meaning he had a serious and agonizing sickness in his stomach. Incurable Disease: This wasn't just a temporary illness; it was something that couldn't be cured . It was a disease that would last forever. What Does It Mean? This verse speaks of a death that is: Unending: It’s not going to end with a quick recovery. Severe: It's incredibly painful and debilitating. Godly Punishment: The Lord is punishing David for his sins, specifically his disobedience and pride. It’s a judgment from God. Important Context (Briefly): 2 Chronicles 21 describes David’s death as a consequence of disobeying God's commands and being arrogant. It’s a reminder that even the most powerful people are subject to God’s will. In short, this verse tells us that David died with a terrible and permanent sickness, a punishment from God for his actions. --- Do you want me to: Explain another Bible verse? Give you some context about the story of David's life?